The tradeoff is complexity. The microcode must be carefully arranged so that the instructions in delay slots are either useful setup for both paths, or at least harmless if the redirect fires. Not every case is as clean as RETF. When a PLA redirect interrupts an LCALL, the return address is already pushed onto the microcode call stack (yes, the 386 has a microcode call stack) -- the redirected code must account for this stale entry. When multiple protection tests overlap, or when a redirect fires during a delay slot of another jump, the control flow becomes hard to reason about. During the FPGA core implementation, protection delay slot interactions were consistently the most difficult bugs to track down.
格力电器：第一大股东珠海明骏拟减持不超2%公司股份
2.7 亿个参数 — 比 Gemma 3n E2B 小 10 倍，但足以满足函数调用需求。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
但a16z的美国活力团队今年集体转向，旗帜鲜明地押注物理世界的重建。
。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
The problem compounds in pipelines. Each TransformStream adds another layer of promise machinery between source and sink. The spec doesn't define synchronous fast paths, so even when data is available immediately, the promise machinery still runs.
Skip 熱讀 and continue reading熱讀。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读